Can I read Tunnel Technique vs. CAF for Root Coverage on EtoBox?

Tunnel Technique vs. CAF for Root Coverage by salobo1996 is a document available to read on EtoBox.

What is Tunnel Technique vs. CAF for Root Coverage about?

This randomized clinical trial compares the tunnel technique with connective tissue graft (TUN) and the coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative (CAF) for treating gingival recession defects. Results show that TUN significantly improves recession reduction and root coverage compared to CAF, with thicker gingiva associated with better outcomes. The study utilized innovative 3D digital measuring methods to evaluate healing dynamics and gingival dimensions over 12 months.

Author

salobo1996

Language

EN